This is a HUGE ruling against Unions..... GOOD!
When it comes to the reality of a creator God, few have said it so eloquently as Christian apologetic Ravi Zacharias:
I think a Muslim baker who wanted to follow the law would sell to a gay couple.
That may have been me. It's entirely possible Ascension is also a "character"account.
Agreed she was classy in her responses.
A child abuser having dinner.
I have no data to know that this number is "very low". One could argue that those with children in school should also work; everyone else seems to manage.
But then do you choose to fight or do you just choose to forgo the relationship? I feel that if the person and I have too many differences in their differences that I can?t live with I just forgo the relationship
I love that gma outed him for not even having the damn degree LOLOLOLOLOL
Engineering is not like other sciences.
So are there any Christians who will reject this insanity? "Accepting" Jesus is all that counts and your behavior doesn't matter? The OP is not that bad because it acknowledges that this would cause heaven to be terrible for everyone.
If we compare what was happening for the next 200 years in Europe and the Middle East, we find the Ottoman Empire is enjoying a tail end of a civilization with so much each and comfort and any wars safely far away. While Europe was committing cultural and financial suicide and seriously injuring itself, until they finally in exhaustion they simply gave up on trying to conquer each other and save the common church. The medieval church was a church for everyone. We know from records that church attendance actually went down, especially in Protestant areas. There was a social revolution going on, while Islam was growing fat and comfortable within a state that imposed universal peace. And the victims of that European social revolution found refuge in the ISlamic state. Protestants from Hungary and Transylvania and Unitarians from that area fled to the Ottoman Lands. The Jews fled the inquisition in Spainfor Islamic lands and the Dutch revolutionary state. We know they were invited there to provide cheap labor, and the invitation said according to old law, what you do in your home, is your business. So Jews went there and worshiped in their homes and were not persecuted. And Holland, that little bit of swampland took on the Spanish Empire, that under Phillip II included Austria and its lands, several of the Italian states, Spain and Portugal and their overseas empires of Latin America, Southern Africa from Angola around and including the cape to Mozambique, Ceylon, Hormuz, the Philippines, Macao, Taiwan, Gao in India. The first world wide nautical empire. And the Dutch sailed where they wanted and took what they wanted, usually the richest and most sea accessible parts, and soon they accumulated their own empire.
Nope. It's altruism, humanitarianism, the kind of stuff we make morals out of. Morality is a code of behaviour between right/wrong. Essentially a moral is a judgement call including rational as well as abstract thought.
Well the OP is about how some atheist scientists sometimes DO think about religion. It happens, and the question is whether it's good for science. Your statement that most atheists never think about religion is irrelevant, even if true.
So what is the difference between the fundamentalist believer and the liberal believer in any religion? One may be a bit more tolerant on the outside but they both believe they are correct. Yes one may attend LGBTQ events but if asked at church, Temple or Mosque about it you will find them saying prayers or quoting scripture that says homosexuality is an affront to God. So is there a difference in their beliefs?
But, based on your philosophy, the elderly wouldn't need any help if they had made the right decisions throughout their lives, and the children are the parent's responsibility, not ours.
You call it hell, and hell is imagined as being a burning place. To say you know that as hell is not supported by anything other than an ancient book of mythology. To now say it is just being separated from god is an apologists version.