You can build a safe room from the used containers to keep the haters out.
??The students found the burlesque videos, huh? Sure..????
^^^^Should be the feature comment.
Be cas man be laid back and cas
I agree with you.
Everything that I am too lazy to put down. Perfect!
Excellent point. Using the first case as an example, the police will look for evidence that a crime was committed, which may exist, but never be found, exist and be found, or not exist at all. If it didn't actually happen, there certainly will be no evidence. If sufficient evidence is not found, it will be, for society, as if the theft never happened at all. It could be a lie; it could be a hallucination. The victim, in this case, is just SOL.
I don't know how people still don't have this information. My only wisdom is my sister had her first child almost three years ago. My sister is extremely smart, competent person with a lucrative career. Now she is crazed person with no memory that yells at random people at Target or anyone that makes her life as a parent more difficult. Also I don't know how it is for most women, but my sister basically does 80% for her son, my mom and I do 10% and her husband does 5%. She even has to take a shower holding my nephew which means it's only luke warm. If you want luke warm showers and no memory...don't use protection.
Can you give an example? Do you mean, eg, that if I could transport back to the 1st c CE, I could "know" whether Jesus of Nazareth actually existed as a historical person? But since I can't teleport, to some extent I have to take it on faith? If that's what you mean to say, then true, but true for every piece of history & info we inherit.
I don't want to ruin the surprise, but.....
Harm to dignity???
What is done to the children if they refuse? I shudder to think what these fascists will do to them.
This has nothing to do with Jesus in my mind. The place was around in 90 CE, but not before. The issue is the church needs it to be, so they lie and say it is.
No, I seriously agree.
Yep. While anger has it's positive sides, I see no use in going into a discussion to get angry. Maybe going into a discussion to vent one's anger helps the angry person? If done right it can also have entertainment value. Many comedy routines are angry rants.
I think that first of all you should establish which god is the correct god.
I'm pretty sure anyone with an intelligence can understand my post quite fine, and it doesn't take a smart person to figure out who is a troll (who is troll isn't exactly the proper usage of the term here).
We have issues with Muslims. Not Islam. And as I stated, not all Muslims share this belief.
Was there compensation for the interview?
well. staring while licking something suggestively.
Yes there is actually a lot of pretty clear and convincing evidence that God does not exist. Of course it's difficult to prove a negative. However there are a lot of things that should or should not be true if God does or does not exist. For example there is no clear evidence of the existence of any gods which is not surprising of no gods exist. Arguments for God?s existence suffer from irreparable logical flaws, which should not be the case if there really is a God. Religion demands faith and discourages attempts to verify its claims through testing and experimentation. This fact is less surprising if there is no God. Religion has a history of intolerance and violence, and this not likely to be true if there is a God. Science is a very effective way of gaining knowledge. Revelation and scriptural study are not, as people disagree about both and this fact is more likely to be true if there is no God. Religion attempts to suppress outside examination and criticism, and this fact is less surprising if there is no God. Religion has cruel, dangerous and repressive doctrines which it is morally incumbent upon us not to support. This should not be true if religion is true. There is a vast amount of religious confusion and disagreement between people who are members of the same religion. This fact is less surprising if there is no God. Religion is fragmented into sects that cannot agree on key issues of doctrine or ethics, and this should not be true of religion is true. Religions emerge in isolated areas and only then spread in space and time, rather than appearing in every society at once. If there is a God this should not be the case. The mind has a physical basis, and this fact is less like to be true if there is a God. There is too much gratuitous evil and unnecessary suffering. This should not be true if there is a God. Naturalism is the norm and supernaturalism cannot be verified which makes sense if there is no God. The Bible contains many contradictions and historical inaccuracies, and this fact is less surprising if there is no God. For the most part belief in God is a force for stagnation and against progress. This should not be true if there is a God. Atheists are no less happy or fortunate than believers and usually more so. This should not be the case if God exists.
It does happen if ya get old enough
Not you. Landsnark. Hence Gottabesaid's apparent "arrogence".
I am always told that it is impossible to prove there is no god but given the state of earthly affairs over the millennia and the tens of thousands of so called gods I think we are safe in assuming that there is no intervening god.
So, in a sense the Catholic affiliation can be recognised in genetics. Can you tell how we can do it? I just get worried: could I be a genetic Catholic by whatever chance?
LOL join club, most people are not good at relationships
You know what ? The most backwards racist folks I have ever been around were from the North East and Idaho ! Healing had been ongoing and in view down here in the deep south. Believe whatever you want but the media Is the real culprit in the free fall.
Isimply do Not ignore what it says. You understand the jewish folks still follow that, right?