If you have valid scientific evidence that falsifies the age of the earth, post it.
Looks like he can:
My mother used to tell me "son, if its too good to be true, it isn't"
Blacks too...htf did that happen
Very soon, there'll be dancing , dancing, dancing in the street.
If someone prays to be cured of ebola it is useless.
and our own country and the white only businesses? why would we ever want to relive that shame as a country?
The impression that I always get from people like this is that they view NOT being a racist as some virtuous "good deed"...that since he is white, he has this ability to bestow, upon those he views as somehow lesser, with the gift of his "non-racism".
Do you have any reason to believe number 2?
I'm a non-Canadian who really likes CFL, but I can't pick a fave team to get behind. A lot of teams have players I like, but my favorite CFLer (Darien Durant) retired. Any advice out there as to who is worthy of random fandom?
You possess that freedom to choose. No one should be shoving ?their gods?
Sandal is a smooth controller class operator. I watched the first section of this series when you first mentioned it. Some of the guest expert comments were appalling. There were a few students who consistently objected to the anti-social framework being used by many of the other students to justify profit gains. Instead of guiding these students (who saw the bigger society-level picture) to make their arguments more powerful, Sandel appropriated their objections to help the ?free marketeer? students rephrase their ignorant opinions so as to be worded more socially acceptably. Sandel appears as another even-keel bourgeois pilot of ?balanced ideological neutral ?positions, more charade and ceremony than education. While the planet burns.
lmao Yes girl. The whole cast was 19-21 except her. It?s kind of creepy she ended up marrying him now lol.
As we gain knowledge we now understand it is dangerous mind pollution
Whatever. You said opposition to abortion isn't a religious argument. I showed that it can be.
That would make the literal, divine, inerrant, and infallible into something that is at least partially figurative, man-made, wrong, or out-of-date. Makes you wonder what else is wrong about the rest of their story....
So they say as well. That's the problem.
Oh man! I didn't read your comment and posted the same thing!
What "legal excuse" do we have now? Would that happen to be something called "freedom of speech" protected under the first amendment? Is that the source you presume allows people to commit "hateful acts"?
oops, wrong article! Now, don't you feel liberated!
With you all the way until the last sentence