How about answering the simple yes/no question you got in stead of answering for someone else?
So you seem to have at least some basic understanding of morality. But could you defend it? What would be your argument against a fanatic who proclaims his enemies as children of the Nephilim? What about a dictator who oppresses his people to "keep the peace" and "protect the integrity of the country"?
God is supposedly perfect. Yet he doesn't show much love.
It was called Canada back then
I think humor and satire is an excellent way to advance dialogue, and make us look at things in a different perspective.
Because if you are handing out literature you must give equal opportunity for any other group to do so. What do think will happen when the Satanic Temple has one of their member's kid passing out their leaflets?
Ok, I see that your delusional arrogance is impenetrable
Cars are made, thry do not breed, nor are they prganic and srlf replicating and capable of evolution. So your comparison is heavily flawed
Stop insulting me.
Donald would scream if he saw a wild animal not in a zoo. They are the first family to not have pets in the WH since Truman. DT doesn't like dogs.
There are no Abrahamics who follow their holy books to the letter, which I pointed out in the post he has been responding to. You , and he, argue against a non-existent strawman.
So, you suggest that burning women and children in Auschwitz is not worse than constructing rockets. Thanks for confirming my opinion about Canadian moral standards.
You?re a conspiracy theorist! All lies! ??
The difference is this:
"Go lie by your dish"
Interestingly it seems that Samantha Can't Understand Normal Thinking.
Nope. :) Sorry your mind holds it that way. Really. It's quite a sad thought that the only reason to be good to others is to get your Eternal Christmas gift and otherwise, screw it. What a very sad way to live.
"What ignorant philosophies do you refer to?"
I see. And how did forced assimilation help Christians get through the 1400s?
What a hoser.
OP is constantly trying to wedge in creationism as a legitimate contender to evolution. While that can be interpreted as not explicitly being against Evolution, his commenting history certainly does not reveal he is a supporter of it.
Yes! Plan ahead guys!