Yes, you're right. I don't know why i took it wrong
If you think about it, airplanes fly themselves despite the fact there?s a pilot. My neighbor is a captain for Continental airlines and he basically told me planes can fly themselves already from takeoff to landing, we just haven?t made the transition into autonomous transportation yet which he believes is the evolution of transportation which will start with cargo planes. This eliminates pilot fatigue and increases efficiency along with drone technology that will evolve into passenger and package transport. Air traffic is the future because of population density, you can only build so roads, bridges and highways in mass populated cities, the next step is air travel and several companies are competing as we speak to become the standard in passenger drone travel with speeds up to 200 mph. They?re also all electric, so no demand on fossil fuels to combat costs and lower maintenance as well with fewer moving parts. Autonomous vehicles are already used in the military as supply trucks, it?s not science fiction anymore and the technology advanced because of all the road side bombs in Iraq that killed soldiers in the beginning of the war. We should embrace this technology because it eliminates risk that will lower insurance rates and increase efficiency across all facets of the business world.
Another triggered snowflake whines.
Jesus's Word would have spread faster if he had more sophisticated transport.
Within the TOE there is the Founder Effect. It usually has to do with a very small population of critters that finds itself in a new environment through migration or tectonic separation, but it also applies to a small group of survivors from some cataclysmic event.
Trump's ban has been approved for the most part.
am I missing something awesome?
Can?t deny that
You haven't noticed that I'm only doing it with you, because you glommed on to an irrelevant point and won't let it go. So I keep yanking your chain. 12 hours ago Hilarius explained it to you, but you wanted to have an argument with a strawman, so I've been obliging you.
I think I phrased myself badly. Dan's point was a historical Jesus existed, there was no need for him to defend a biblical Jesus.
Yes, but the doctrine does not go to purpose, only ability. It is perfectly ok for a married couple to have sex simply because they want to, so long as the lovemaking culminates in an act open to procreation.
Gradualism and natural selection are not doing what evo says. Genetics has busted this wide open.
So he didn't die?
I think Trump goes first. But whoknows
Haha, hence the reason she is the x.
I don't cry, it makes me feel worse
I needed a toothpick!
I do? People do because it makes distinction between all of them. Is it necessary to do that? Idk. They all do the same thing.
The data remains on your side, but then 37 percent of all statistics are made up or heavily modified to make a point . . . including the one I just gave you. But they DO tend to bolster an argument, even when it's total bullshit.
No, theology is very clearly the study of a God, and the nature of God. A type of philosophy, but a distinct strain (like the study of ethics).
They want to have their cake, and litigate it too!
LOL! "Abortion is a consequence of an action"? That's rich, and disgusting at the same time.
It's also the route taken by the 3,000,000+ naturally occurring still-births and 'miscarriages" that happen every year.
I love logic I also can connect god to math through the numbers.