On that side of the world perhaps, don't include us all under another poisoned blanket.
Okay, then how is this piece using ?asymmetric? inaccurately?
And unlike religion, they changed their opinions with the inflow of new evidence.
And how much margin was he making? Surely he was adding value to the steel?
my obsession telling 99% of christians that? i can't think of a single time i've done that any other time from today. not to say it hasn't happened, but safe to say hyperbole doesn't suit you. i am glad to see you've taken note of me though. funny, 8000+ comments and i've never noticed you. for the sake of non-literalism... you've been a delight.
Yep, JWs are very comfortable with a lot of things. The biggest of all that comforts them is your and my death and your neighbor's and loved ones and 99% of humanity that according to JW doctrine will die when their god Jehovah brings about the "end of this system of things," i.e., the end of the world they call Armageddon, a change they fervently pray for daily.
He was and quickly developed loyality to Rome.
And creates more evolutionary niches to fill.
Any argument that allows the shifting of the burden of proof is a bad argument. The default position on existence is to not believe X exist until it is shown to exist. Why change that if it is not needed?
Justice Anthony Kennedy did note that the travel ban could be reviewed every 180 days.
That's a myth!
imagine being a creator, and boss of everything.. consider what you are saying. That you would like to spend all eternity fighting the flames of Hell , than to be with the creator of the ends of the earth and all that there is , including even you!!!
I stated that it is a choice what we DO, nothing more.
I remember my college graduation ceremonies (one for the University, and one for the Department) - the
The whole Social Justice thing has gone totally overboard. Instead of just trying to make the playing field equal or applying some common sense, every little activist cause wants to install petty tyrannies over everyone else and then gets pissed of when anyone objects. You think it's bad here, you should see it over on Twitter. They got trans screaming that its bigotry if you refuse to sleep with them.
"He that loves not, knows not God; for God is love" 1 John 4:8
oh, you really do have tough problem then.
I am opposed to Burqa bans. You cannot liberate women by stripping them.
Of course you realize that applies to all the shit democrats promise and don?t deliver on.
Sure! All the cool kids do that :)
There's a typo there. We were actually all born atheists. You are an atheist to the other 9999 gods.
TRY to be objective and realistic.
Which creationists would that be?
"By your standard, can the man who impregnated her be charged with causing serious bodily harm?"
A lot of them did. Like I suggested, go look at those men?s testimonies of their faith. Thomas Jefferson used the Bible, in public school, which was his idea by the way, in not only the teaching of faith and morals, but for history and English studies as well.
This is a great topic. I don't think there is a definitive answer, though. I feel like it is because we aren't teaching our kids how to deal with rejection. We have this mantra now of everyone is a winner and this sense of entitlement, that when rejection happens many people can't deal with it.
My short answer is that which requires belief is not in fact any minded, it is simply the avoidance of being reasonable or mindful. Those that evangelize are simply offering others what they themselves have been told to believe, more often than not. As such the mindfulness of belief is about equal to the mindful reasoning and oratorical skill of a trained parrot.
And the parallels?
Issuing a subpoena to the sitting administration based on legal advice is nothing more than a PR stunt (otherwise this would happen every day). His lawyers know this will go nowhere unless they have 100% sound evidence of something - which they don't cus Tweets don't count.
True Believers are self insulting.
And they do.