I thought our genetics determined our future.
Working my way up the notifications. Be there soon!
and both sides have these fools. That's what makes the OP silly
Again, I'm not going to quibble over semantics. I am well steeped in Muslim history past and present. "barbaric" nicely but certainly not completely describes Islam. There are barrels of applicable adjectives.
Okay, then let me rephrase: In most cases where women aren't being allowed to leave the house without wearing a burqa (which is the group you're aiming to "show support" for) do you think they will be somehow more liberated by banning public wearing of the burqa? Or do you think they will just lose the freedom to leave the house?
LOL This looks like a Steven Raichlen recipe. If it is you can't go wrong.
Everyone knows that Ambien makes you rub peanut butter on your nipples while singing Mary had a little lamb.
Gee! That's a shame. So, you're saying that the totally bias, corrupt and inept "News Industry" might have to take a hard look at itself and enact some reforms? Gee! How awful!
Ahhhh, smash sammiches, red wine and a joint. Had some good times .
OK, your still deflecting. I'll take it you have no evidence.
And you come to that conclusion because I refuse to accept a whole lot of bullshit invented in a vacuum of evidence? Pft. Keep your opinion, for all I care.
Maybe those hawks can come live in all the trees we're not cutting down in Canada?
Eh, smaller towns near by are on maps. It stands out because there is zero about it until 70 ce.
Funny, I feel the same way about "cunt". My skin kinda crawls a little using it. It's reserved in place of words like "b!tch" and "fvck", which I use too liberally to spit out with the same level of venom.
excellent :) I'm glad!
So you say there is no evidence, and then qualify it by saying there is evidence. I am confused. I am not trying to be annoying, but why say there is no evidence if you know there is evidence? You can bash the evidence and call it unconvincing, but it is just inaccurate to say there is no evidence
oh yes! World of difference.
I might be a bad ask: I'm not sure "Did Jesus actually exist?" is all that important a question either... which seems to be the next question you want to ask.
Youll need to go do your research. Ive got an inbox full of notifications and a ringing phone. We will pick up tomorrow. Cheers
The left continues to reveal its true nature.
And blow your cover? I'm having too much fun at your expense.
You don't need Christianity to be moral. You can do the right thing without the fear of eternal punishment. For Christians who believe that if they were shown that there is no god, they would become murders, rapists and thieves: You are NOT moral people. You do the right thing for your own perceived benefit in the afterlife. That makes you selfish and far more evil than the atheists you think you are better than.
Well see I have a little problem here. I am an anarchist so I don't like to see anyone get in another persons business. So you ask about praying for healing. Now the first thing I must say is that what they do isn't harmful to you. Now if you are looking out for the child I know many things that are harmful to children that have nothing to do with religion. Should you get involved? Well, that is a slippery slope. Who decides? What can be called harmful? People raise children in rat infested places with black mold and old lead paint. Do we get involved in that? It is harmful.
Do you recognize that "moral codes" might lie on a gradation between more simple and more complex?
"How would such knowledge affect your self-image?"
You really like that straw man argument don?t you? Funny how that?s your only argument yet you call me ?dishonest?.
Please: Pity is for theists! Oh... wait... that's me.