I'm in a relationship with a fellow Asian from another country. The religion he was born into is different from mine, so is his culture. It seems that there is more chance of these kind of relationships failing if one or both partners has no firsthand experience of living the other's culture for a certain period prior to their getting together. Since we both aren't religious and interested in different culture (and he is very famiiar with mine), we haven't faced any major problems in our households. But as someone pointed out Asians are racist among themselves,so are my fellow countrymen and women. There's a lot of racism and casteism in our society.Not to mention communalism.
You claim that yet can't show any.
It means you need my D
You are incorrect, and do not know Jesus Christ.
Already did demonstrate that laws legislating morality are bad. And I've already demonstrated to you in previous conversations that every American breaks an average of 3 laws per day. Prison is going to have a hard time holding the entire US population in jail, including all the jailers if your statement is to be respected.
The religion channel and those on it, presumably.
I'd rather to pop the question when I was ready, we did it by talking over time, I really wasn't buying the idea, but I didn't want to dump her either, and there was no way for the relation to stay as it was before that door was opened, I felt like obligated to move forward otherwise I'd have to provide reasons not to and that conversation would end in breaking up for sure and I wasn't ready for that.
More trolling by rule making huddie.
"after two years of investigations, of any wrongdoing by President Trump or by his campaign.".... But here's the rub, What they're finding are Crimes that had nothing to do with the Campaign and some are on their way to Jail as we speak... That's Good enough for me.... 1 at a time 1 by 1 the DOJ will Lock them Up
The reason atheists can't just turn to Islam to fight against is because Islam is not the religion that is in control of this country. Thank god (sarc) we are ridding ourselves of the Christian laws on our books and giving diverse populations more equality. We are ignoring the Christian 'orthodoxy' when it comes to how one can live their lives.
If it?s off the couch, take the win.
Well first, you are referring to a pre-constitutional document, 2 it is referring to the Deist Creator that has nothing to do with Jehovah or the other sky fathers, and 3 in the first draft Jefferson was going to say something far more 'reasoned' but decided to go with a poetic flourish:
Quotemining, taking things out of context, and using ignorant lying homophobic websites. Pathetic.
Education means critical thinking with regards to the content of the received information. Indoctrination is intended to influence targets to believe in what they are told without questioning the veracity or authenticity of the conveyed information.
Won't happen. People complain enough about taxes as it is. Forking over money for churches would be strongly opposed.
I'm doing the research on the next alternate history (About 525 to 725). I think "Without Christianity, would there be Islam?" will obviously be a key part of that hypothetical.
Well, systemic reviews are the highest standard of evidence in science. As I am sure you did not know, as you, of course, provide no links to back up your uninformed opinion.
Well, if you care that much about the foreskins of little boys, go ahead and sue the Government in stead of typing words on a forum.
Separation from this god of yours, eh? Sounds heavenly.
If a holy book was written by or with an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient, omnibenevolent, immutable, transcendental, idempotent and omnivoyant (omnivorus, oviparous?) God He would state clearly what he desired from all his creations in such a way that there would be no ambiguity because he would know what they would be able to understand completely throughout time. But if that book was man-made it would would be biased toward the people creating it. It would only be applicable in their locale at the time they wrote it and only contain knowledge or assumptions they had access to.
Read that discussion again.