I've given you peer reviewed research that you do not accept, from a source put out by the APA, which the APA refers to as "authoriative" and "edited and authored by some of its most respected members". The APA also calls its Handbook an "indispensable and authoritative reference resource to turn to for researchers, instructors, practitioners, and field leaders alike."
If it had nothing to do with god, then why did it mention god was with Judah?!?
Was Mengele right about that? Did it benefit millions? One cannot justify evil on the hope of doing good if that hope is unfounded. Taking risks cannot be said to pay off if they don't pay off. One must weigh the risk of the benefits.
Unfortunately, my husband is cheap and boring. LOL
Your intentional self-contradiction is pointless and not even amusing.
I heard it from you. Didn't register as important enough here.
compliments to your artist!
Ah, yes, the amputee ploy. And how about resurrection from a severed head? Clearly, there are barriers the more complex the act. And why not talk about Nick Vujcic, who was born with no arms and no legs, but with faith in Jesus has overcome all the depression and shame. The full restorative growth of severed or absent arms and legs is still only a theoretical act of faith that has not yet been demonstrated itself. The transformation of Nick Vujcic wasn?t the growth of limbs, but the maintenance and blossoming of his mind, heart, and personality through the love of the God of Jesus Christ.
What surprises me, and maybe you have an answer for this, is how little MtDNA variation there is in a single cell. I would have thought that, by now, there would lots and lots of MtDNA variants observable within a single cell. If mitochondria multiply by division, their DNA should be subject to mutation thereby creating variety. Yet it seems that all mitochondrial DNA within a single cell is pretty much the same.
There is always one question that never gets asked... And I always get caught up in a moment and ask it... Heh... I am so glad I have small feet. They fit so well inside my mouth...
There's hundreds, if not thousands of other gods.
False. Obviously, you do not know me at all. I have no fear. I also have no trouble accepting the fact that there are millions of people like you. But thank you for your comments, such as they are.
A member of the Bar association? No.
we are discussing the apostasies of satans club - i believe i am in the right spot.
You have it backwards and sideways, you 'recognize' rights, you don't 'impose' them. And you can advocate for legal recognition of human rights. because your Aunt Martina told you to or any other reason, as can all the other advocates of recognizing human rights. You all want to recognize the civil right to be free from discrimination by race that's great no matter the reason you are advocating it.
Potato! It's a potato!
I recently found new appreciation for Star Wars when I read that Lucas intended it to be an analogy for the Vietnam War. The Empire represented the American technologically advanced military industrial complex, in case you were wondering...
"First of all, my religious views on abortion are separate from whether or not it should be legal."
The main issue there would be roundworm, hookworm etc. They can't get heartworm from feces, just mosquitos.
Good grief, I really am getting tired of the pettiness here. You understand my comment in the context I made it, so don't waste our time with this kind of nonsense. And if you don't understand me, then leave me alone and respond to somebody else's posts.
But still a liar.
Rarely do I cite wiki but seems ok here
Did I say that? Hell, there are probably conservative voters who want that too. Combined, that accounts for 19 people. Hardly anything to even talk about.
It is not a belief but a proven fact that Big Bang and Evolution are invalid science theories because not only that both violate physical laws or physics, both can not pass logic at the minimum.
I love how close they all are.
I believe there is a distinction to be made between "discernment" and "judgment". Discernment being the more intellectual, every day processing of information to discover truth, and Judgment consisting of more negative connotations, looking down upon other people. The context of the verse implies that everybody has their individual faults, and in order to approach them on these faults, it must be done with the proper etiquette and respect that is due to another human being. Of course, we should question what is true, or moral, or wise. But it is also important to remember that we all fall short, and if we must correct a brother's faults, it should be done with love.
With very small and light guns, it's possible.
Are you judging me?
Sounds like bullshit to me
If you were to look at the Jewish interpretation of the Bible, through the Talmud, you would see a completely different view point.
How when the Bible is not specific timewise? If you are going by someone's interpretation of the time period based on the Bible, I am afraid you have a much larger problem than 20 years. Much larger.
i knew a korean woman who was very pretty, and guys fell all over her. and she was really hated by all her female co workers. [really!] and she had a perfect figure. and she wondered why all the women hated her. [she was sleeping with the bosss. ] and i told her they resented her appearance, and the fact that all the guys were hot for her.
She became a, what was one of her favorite epithets? "Moocher"!