I can assure you that whatever different way God would have done it, atheists would have complained about it. Almost everytime I browse Disqus, there are atheists who chastise God for failing to stop evil or for allowing cancer. But if God sacrifices a member of his own family to save everyone's soul, that's stupid too.
Actually, virgin birth is a common trope in the ancient world, & a cross-cultural one. Lao Tzu of Taoism was conceived by a shooting star. Gautama Buddha had a virgin birth. So did most Roman emperors.
Lol I'm sleepy
Holy shit, nice shift of the goalposts there.
Well, to say it's wrong is to accept God as that event.
I gave to an example counter to your assertions (not what I "believe") and you tell me it's wrong because it doesn't fit your article. This is why you believe you're "schooling" people on forums like this. You believe you know every thing already and therefore anything someone says to the contrary must be false because it's not what you know. How can someone actually have a discussion with you. They give up out of annoyance and you believe that they've given in and have been schooled.
"God created man and faith. Satan's riposte was to create priests and preachers."
What you feel is only so much garbage, especially as you have not identified either this person or cited any of this person's mainstream, peer-reviewed scientific writings.
I call it the Ice Queen..until I can make it to my quiet freak out corner. Thinking about emergencies period has me flashback freaking out at the time my youngest choked on a piece of fruit. I don't think my blood even circulated as I focused on her, and getting it out.
Guess I need to go tell my friend that he's wrong because some guy on the internet with a masters degree says it's not possible regardless of what he sees.
They can. They have free will. People have recently WALKED over 1,000 miles in the hope of improving their lives.
Look up what Jesus says about loving your neighbors. Do it between your next comments hating on gays.
It'll be interesting to see if this demographic gets out and votes.
Yeah, and if you don't pay taxes they ask questions. You have to file. In order to process credit cards, especially.
... So not repeatable? If that's what you are stating, than there is no value in a non-repeatable experience.
You can frame it that way if you like, I?m going to leave it up to Trumps far right SCOTUS
"The religious type."
I agree with your first sentence. And I hope your second is wrong.
My bad--went over my head.
That was a remarkable listing of unsubstantiated allegations. Did you wish to make a point?
Thank you for pointing out what is obvious to any raional thinking person.
Here's my updated old list with some blanks. Feel free to let me know if it's changed.
What if you personally found something morally repulsive but your religion did not regard it as a sin. Would you still personally regard it as a sin?
Ooohhh they?re great for wrapping fragile stuff too when you?re moving. :)
My niece always wants to go home, because she's a Mama's girl, but my nephew likes staying, because he gets to watch YT on my tablet when he's at my house. LMAO!
On previous organisms having a civilization and advanced life, I doubt that, mainly due to the brain sizes of organisms we do know about (could always be unknown). But limited knowledge is known so its a possibility.
I?d buy you an ice cream ;)